Aligned Short Fibres

In many applications it is inconvenient to use continuous fibres, for example, composites that are injection moulded or where the form is laid up by spraying - just look at the back of any fibre glass chair and you can readily see the short lengths of fibre (these are actuallty quite large, about 3cm or so) in comparison with the short fibres used in injection moulded parts. One interesting feature of composites containing chopped fibres is that they are almost as strong as those containing continuous fibres; providing the fibres exceed a critical length. Fibres shorter than the critical length will not carry their maximum load are thus unable to function effectively. Beyond the critical length the fibres will carry an increasing fraction of the applied load and may fracture before the matrix especially if the matrix material has some ductility eg. a thermoplastic such as peek or a metal matrix. It is therefore necessary to determine what the CRITICAL FIBRE LENGTH is.

To evaluate the critical fibre length we need to look at the process of load transfer to the fibre - since we are grabbing hold of the fibre through the matrix then we are relying on the shear strength of the matrix and/or matrix fibre interface to carry the load to the fibre - in effect a frictional loading by SHEAR LAG. Just try holding your index finger in the fist of your other hand and then try to pull the finger ouit from the clenched fist - you can feel the shear resistance in the palm of your fist and you can also feel the tensile stress in the index finger near your knuckles put not down at the tip of your index finger. Hence a shear stress is used to transfer the applied load to the fibre - so that the fibre can do its job and the tensile stress that results from this in the fibre is not the same along the length of the fibre - in fact it increases from zero at the free end to some arbitary value in th emiddle of the fibre then decreases as we move towards the other free end.

First we shall work out what that shear stress in the matrix, tm, does. Look at the small shaded element in red,



The force acting normal to that small element df must be equal to the shear force acting on the edge of the element or else we would see the disc bulge at the centre. So the force on the edge is just the product of the stress (tm) and the area it acts on ie. the circumference multiplied by dx



The total force acting along the fibre is simply calculated by integrating the above equation with respect to x, the distance along the fibre.



(We have substituted sm/2 for tm where sm is the normal stress in the matrix - this is ok because the Tresca criteria says that the shear stress is half the difference between the two principal stresses - since there is only one stress, sm, applied parallel to the fibres and none applied perpendicualr tothe fibres (principal stresses are always at right angles to each other) then tm = sm/2. We can get an equation for the stress at any point along the fibre - measured from either of the free ends by dividing the force by the cross-sectional area of the fibre.



So the stress would appear to increase linearly from zero at the end to a maximum at the centre of the fibre. However, we must be careful, as the fibre gets longer, the stress at the mid point could rise beyond the fracture strength of the fibre - before that though we reach a situation where it is necessary to impart some compatability between the fibre and the matrix namely, that the strain in the fibre (measured parallel to the fibre) cannot exceed the strain in the matrix adjacent to it - In other words, the stress in the fibre can increase only to a value that is equal to the strain in the same fibre if it were a continuous fibre (isostrain rule).






Shows how the stress varies along the lengthof a fibre when the fibre is shorter than the critical length (l1) and longer than the critical length (l2)






for a linear elastic matrix. Similarly, the maximum fibre stress cannot exceed the fracture strength of the fibre.



The fibre is used most efficiently when the fibre length, lc, is such that the matrix and the fibre fail at the same strain. This is the critical fibre length is



When l < lc then it is impossible for the fibre to fail and the stress will increase linearly with distance from each end to a maximum s(max) = l/d.sm. The average stress in the fibre is then obtained by integrating the stress function over the length of the fibre.



When the fibre exceeds the critical length, the isostrain criteria sets a maximum strain that the fibre cannot exceed (ie. the strain in the matrix) and so the stress in the centre section of the fibre will be that determined by the isostrain rule. The average stress in the fibre is then



where sf(e) is the stress in a 'continuous' fibre at the current strain.




Now that we know the average stress in the fibre for both the case of fibres shorter than lc and longer than lc, we can work out the stress in the composite which is simply given by the volume average of the stress on the two consituents and the elastic modulus parallel to the short fibres follows from the isostrain rule.

For l < lc, the stress on the composite is


For l > lc, the stress on the composite is





Stiffness of Aligned Short Fibre Composites

We can use the same methodology to obtain the elastic modulii of the short fibre composite as we did for the continuous fibre composite. Using Hookes' Law we can substitute Ee for the stress in each component. In the matrix, the strain is uniform and equal to that in the composite, in th eshort fibres, the strain varies with position along the fibre but averages out, along each fibre, to the strain in the matrix. Hence after canceling the strain terms we end up with.

The stiffness measured perpendicular to the fibre axis is just the same as the continuous fibre case that we looked at earlier. But what about where the fibres are oriented in random directions ? Since random orientations occur quite commonly in composites which are made by spraying a combination of chopped fibres and resin onto a mould form we need a different method for estimating the elastic modulus.

Orientation Distributions

How do we calculate the elastic properties of a short fibre composite when the fibres are not aligned but have a distribution of orientations. Click here to find out!

Strength of Short Fibre Composites

In short fibre composites - such as dough and sheet moulding compounds, or even chopped fibre reinforced mmc castings, the strength of the composite will depend on the length of the fibres and the orientation as well as the volume fraction. It is perhaps one of the great advanages of the injection moulding - squeeze casting fabrication route (possibly forging) that the dies can be made such that the flow of matrix is approximately parallel to the direction which will experience the greatest tensile stress. Given the fibre morphology, the bulk of the fibres will align in the flow direction and the effective volume fraction of fibres can range from 50 to almost 100% of the nominal fibre loading.

If the fibres are of optimum length then the matrix and fibre will fail simultaneously, the fibre experiencing its fracture stress at the midpoint of the fibre, with the average stress carried in the fibre being one half that value. Using the isostrain rule we find

where f, in this case, is the actual fibre loading parallel to the tensile stress. If the fibres are longer than the critical length then the strength in the composite will depend on whether the matrix or fibres fail first and the arguments developed in the previous two sections can be followed if is substituted for sf

How do we calculate the strength of a short fibre composite when the fibres are not aligned but have a distribution of orientations. Click here to find out!